Scott Pruitt, the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, claims he’s on a mission to make science at the EPA more transparent — but scientists have their own ideas about what kind of transparency leads to trustworthy science.
Last week, Pruitt proposed a rule that would require the EPA to release the data behind any studies used for crafting policies to protect the environment and public health, like keeping air and water clean. While that sounds reasonable, in reality the rule would have the exact opposite effect of transparency: It would force the government to spend time and money to redact confidential information like medical records, or — more likely — disqualify research that includes sensitive data from being used in...
from The Verge - All Posts https://ift.tt/2rcvZkk
via IFTTT //
No comments:
Post a Comment